L1 WORKBENCH
Canonical Reference: CANONICAL_PLATFORM_ARCHITECTURE.md
This document is downstream of the canonical architecture. Refer to the canonical source for current truth.
Status: CURRENT
Scope: Human product grammar, surface doctrine, Context Lenses
Canonical Owner: Product
Last Verified: 2026-07-11
Evidence Basis: docs/CANON.md, docs/architecture/PRODUCT_ARCHITECTURE.md, docs/architecture/WORKBENCH_DOCTRINE.md, docs/platform-specs/03-workspace-runtime.md, Option B evidence
Supersedes: none
Superseded By: none
1. PRODUCT TARGET: ONE L1 WORKBENCH
The human product is a single L1 Workbench.
The human does not leave L1. Intelligence is a silent partner inside L1. Governance appears when policy requires it.
L1 OPERATIONAL WORKBENCH
2. PRODUCT GRAMMAR
CONTEXT LENS
→ ENTITY COLLECTION
→ ENTITY 360
→ ACTIVITY
→ CONTEXTUAL INTELLIGENCE
→ ACTION
→ GOVERNANCE WHEN REQUIRED
→ EXECUTION STATE
→ CONTINUITY
This is the operating grammar. All human operational interaction resolves through this sequence or a contextual subset.
L2/L3 are not separate screens. They are panel states inside L1.
3. CONTEXT LENS DOCTRINE
SAME ENTITY
+
DIFFERENT CONTEXT LENS
=
DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL EMPHASIS
Context Lenses are roles, departments, industries, and capability clusters applied to the same underlying entity.
Examples:
- Account Success lens
- Finance lens
- BizOps lens
- IT Administration lens
None of these lenses is automatically a separate product boundary. Each is a projection unless separate product evidence authorizes otherwise.
Department surfaces seen in repository code/docs should be documented as Context Lenses unless a repo-check proves product boundary necessity.
4. TWIN INSIDE L1
Twin is not a separate product interface.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ FOUR-BUTTON OODA GRAMMAR │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ OBSERVE → STORE IN SPINE (persist truth to Spine) │
│ ORIENT → ASK YOUR TWIN (query Twin for insight) │
│ DECIDE → ASSIGN YOUR TWIN (delegate to Twin for plan) │
│ ACT → APPROVE TWIN'S ACTION (human approval gates exec) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Twin never gets a direct Act button. Every consequential execution is gated by human approval.
No pop-ups, no chat window, no “How can I help?” greeting.
5. REUSABLE PRODUCT GRAMMAR
Canonical reference patterns from current corpus:
-
Leads and Lead Detail surfaces provide the strongest known entity collection and entity 360 grammar reference. They demonstrate canonical interaction patterns without implying CRM product scope.
-
Entity Collection grammar: filterable, sortable, role/content-lens-aware view of operational entities.
-
Entity 360 grammar: single entity continuation view with activity, intelligence, action, governance, execution state, and continuity.
-
Activity grammar: continuation markers, unresolved state, prior decision awareness, model/context continuation.
-
Intelligence grammar: contextual, not modal. Appears inline when policy, entity state, or user action asks for it.
-
Action grammar: propose, govern, execute, remember.
6. WHAT L1 IS NOT
L1 ≠ CRM
L1 ≠ Chat
L1 ≠ Dashboard
L1 ≠ Admin shell
L1 ≠ Department portal
L1 ≠ L2 chat drawer
L1 ≠ Twin portal
L1 ≠ Report builder
L1 is the operational work surface governed by continuity. It projects capability and continues operational memory.