{"slug":"strategy/business-strategy/SYSTEM_GAP_EXECUTION_ROADMAP","title":"IntegrateWise System-Gap Execution Roadmap","section":"strategy","sectionLabel":"Strategy","status":"unclassified","type":"document","path":"strategy/business-strategy/SYSTEM_GAP_EXECUTION_ROADMAP.mdx","bytes":12024,"description":null,"updated":null,"source":"integratewise/Integratewise-docs-wiki","content":"\n## Objective\n\nConvert the existing architecture into a demonstrably reliable governed-continuity platform: every user-visible action must be authorized, durable, reconciled, auditable, and readable back through the Workbench.\n\n## Completion Definition\n\nThe program is complete when a production-like environment proves this golden path end to end:\n\nAuthenticate → resolve tenant and authority → ingest provider event → normalize → promote canonical context to Spine → refresh projection → render Workbench → propose governed action → approve or deny → execute provider action → reconcile outcome → persist evidence/audit → read verified state back in UI.\n\nNo action may display durable success before authoritative readback confirms the expected terminal or observing state.\n\n## Workstreams\n\n### 1. Stabilize Runtime Truth\n\n**Goal:** Remove every known placeholder, fake completion path, and unimplemented production route.\n\n**Actions**\n\n- Inventory all `TODO`, `FIXME`, stub, mock-only, “not implemented,” and placeholder execution paths across apps, packages, and services.\n- Classify each item as: release blocker, feature-flagged beta, internal-only, or dead code slated for removal.\n- Implement the Spine timeline persistence path, including durable write, idempotency, provenance, and readback.\n- Complete Sales Workbench Twin query, assignment, and approval-flow handlers; otherwise hide them behind feature flags with explanatory disabled states.\n- Remove or safely gate every generic “Section not implemented” route.\n- Validate all hostnames, Gateway endpoints, routes, environment bindings, and service contracts in a deployable environment.\n\n**Exit criteria**\n\n- No production route exposes an unfinished implementation.\n- No material mutation uses local-only or placeholder persistence.\n- All live routes resolve against deployed service endpoints.\n\n### 2. Establish Canonical Command Lifecycle\n\n**Goal:** Make every material command follow one authoritative, observable lifecycle.\n\n**Actions**\n\n- Standardize command states: `DRAFT`, `PROPOSED`, `PENDING_APPROVAL`, `APPROVED`, `DENIED`, `DISPATCHED`, `OBSERVING`, `VERIFIED`, `FAILED`, `COMPENSATION_REQUIRED`, `COMPENSATED`.\n- Define command contracts for correlation ID, tenant ID, actor/delegation, capability grant, idempotency key, policy decision, evidence references, and reconciliation record.\n- Enforce server-derived tenant, authority, and policy context for every mutation.\n- Block completion UI until reconciliation produces durable readback.\n- Ensure failed evidence/audit writes fail closed for material operations.\n\n**Exit criteria**\n\n- Every material command is traceable across UI, Gateway, policy, execution, reconciliation, Spine, and audit.\n- A command cannot become “complete” without verifiable terminal-state evidence.\n\n### 3. Complete Provider and MCP Resilience\n\n**Goal:** Ensure the product is safe and usable when integrations degrade.\n\n**Actions**\n\n- Add designed degraded states for MCP Pool outage, provider outage, connector authentication failure, slow hydration, and partial data availability.\n- Implement safe read-only cache fallback only where freshness and authorization rules permit it.\n- Add retry actions with bounded backoff, correlation IDs, user-visible status, and idempotency protection.\n- Expose connector health, freshness, last successful sync, last error, and recommended remediation in Workbench views.\n- Ensure unavailable execution controls are disabled rather than optimistically invoked.\n\n**Exit criteria**\n\n- Every MCP-backed or connector-backed view has loading, empty, error, degraded, recovery, and permission-denied states.\n- Provider/MCP failures cannot create false-success UI outcomes.\n\n### 4. Harden Frontend State and UX\n\n**Goal:** Make the Workbench a truthful projection of platform state.\n\n**Actions**\n\n- Define a shared frontend state model for command, approval, reconciliation, hydration, connector-health, and evidence states.\n- Replace unbounded optimistic updates with authoritative post-mutation readback for all governed actions.\n- Add visible provenance, freshness, audit/evidence links, policy reason, approval status, and reconciliation status to material Workbench actions.\n- Create a route-readiness matrix: route owner, API/service, data source, fallback behavior, mutations, audit visibility, reconciliation visibility, automated test, and release status.\n- Clarify ownership between `web`, `workspace`, `platform`, `platform-console`, `one-access`, and `one-access-console`.\n\n**Exit criteria**\n\n- Each production route declares its source of truth and failure behavior.\n- UI states accurately distinguish queued, observing, verified, failed, and compensated actions.\n\n### 5. Repair Monorepo Governance\n\n**Goal:** Ensure every runnable production component is included in standard engineering controls.\n\n**Actions**\n\n- Verify that `apps`, `packages`, `services`, `mcp`, `marketplace`, and all deployable subprojects are deliberately included or excluded from workspace orchestration.\n- Create a machine-readable component catalog covering owner, maturity, deployment unit, interfaces, inbound dependencies, outbound dependencies, data stores, and retirement status.\n- Enforce dependency direction: apps → packages/contracts; services → packages/contracts; prohibit packages from importing services; prohibit UI from direct provider calls.\n- Remove or quarantine backup/reference directories from build, import, deployment, and documentation discovery paths.\n- Make architecture checks, contract checks, and governed-chain checks required CI gates.\n\n**Exit criteria**\n\n- Every production component is covered by install, build, typecheck, lint, test, security, and release policy.\n- Dependency violations fail CI.\n\n### 6. Build Real End-to-End Proof\n\n**Goal:** Replace visibility-only tests with deployed, durable workflow verification.\n\n**Actions**\n\n- Provision an isolated, production-like E2E environment with real service bindings, tenant-scoped stores, and provider sandbox/test doubles.\n- Build one Playwright golden-path spec covering authentication, ingestion, normalization, Spine promotion, projection, governed action, approval, dispatch, reconciliation, audit, and UI readback.\n- Seed test data only through real ingestion or supported setup APIs; do not directly seed final UI projections.\n- Add independent assertions against provider test double, reconciliation record, Spine entity/timeline, projection API, audit API, and browser UI.\n- Replace fixed sleeps with polling on correlation IDs and terminal-state predicates.\n- Add negative-path suites for denial, expired delegation, duplicate webhook, retry, provider timeout, provider rejection, compensation, MCP outage, and cross-tenant access attempts.\n\n**Exit criteria**\n\n- E2E tests prove the golden path and each critical failure path in CI.\n- Browser success assertions are backed by durable service and data-store readback.\n\n### 7. Operationalize Observability\n\n**Goal:** Make failures diagnosable across distributed workflows.\n\n**Actions**\n\n- Require a correlation ID from browser intent through Gateway, capability, governance, provider dispatch, reconciliation, Spine update, and audit.\n- Publish a trace view for operators showing state transitions, policy decisions, retries, provider responses, and evidence links.\n- Define SLOs for API availability, ingestion latency, projection freshness, command completion, reconciliation delay, and provider error rate.\n- Add alerts for failed reconciliation, audit-write failure, endpoint contract drift, connector degradation, and E2E regression.\n\n**Exit criteria**\n\n- An operator can explain any material command outcome without manual log archaeology.\n\n## Phased Plan\n\n### Phase 0: Baseline and Freeze — Week 1\n\n- Appoint accountable owners for runtime, frontend, data/Spine, integrations, test platform, and release.\n- Run a repository-wide implementation inventory and mark release blockers.\n- Freeze new user-facing workflow features until known placeholder paths are classified.\n- Produce the component catalog and route-readiness matrix.\n\n**Deliverables:** gap register, ownership map, route matrix, component catalog, release-blocker list.\n\n### Phase 1: Correctness Foundation — Weeks 2–4\n\n- Implement timeline persistence and mutation readback.\n- Resolve broken routes/endpoints and environment bindings.\n- Finish or feature-gate unfinished Sales Workbench actions and generic routes.\n- Standardize command and reconciliation contracts.\n- Make audit/evidence failure behavior explicit and fail closed for material operations.\n\n**Deliverables:** no-placeholder release candidate, canonical command lifecycle, verified persistence tests.\n\n### Phase 2: Resilient Product Experience — Weeks 3–6\n\n- Ship MCP/connector degraded modes, fallback rules, and connector-health surfaces.\n- Add frontend lifecycle state components and authoritative mutation refresh.\n- Add provenance, approval, reconciliation, and evidence presentation for key workflows.\n- Complete product-surface ownership definitions.\n\n**Deliverables:** resilient Workbench UX, route readiness enforced, truthful state presentation.\n\n### Phase 3: E2E and CI Enforcement — Weeks 5–8\n\n- Stand up the isolated E2E environment.\n- Implement golden-path Playwright and service-readback tests.\n- Add failure/compensation/isolation suites.\n- Require architecture, governed-chain, contract, deployment-policy, and E2E gates before promotion.\n\n**Deliverables:** CI-enforced golden path, failure-path coverage, release evidence package.\n\n### Phase 4: Operability and Scale — Weeks 8–10\n\n- Add correlation/trace view, SLO dashboards, and alerting.\n- Tune test parallelism and resource limits for deterministic CI.\n- Conduct a production-readiness review using evidence from real deployments and E2E runs.\n\n**Deliverables:** operator traceability, SLOs, alerting, production-go decision record.\n\n## Prioritized Backlog\n\n### P0 — Release blockers\n\n- Replace timeline placeholder with durable Supabase persistence and readback.\n- Complete or disable unfinished Workbench actions and unimplemented routes.\n- Fix unresolved hostnames, API routes, and deployment bindings.\n- Add MCP Pool and connector outage UX.\n- Create the deployed golden-path E2E suite.\n- Make governance, architecture, and E2E checks mandatory CI gates.\n\n### P1 — Required for trustworthy operations\n\n- Add command lifecycle contract and universal correlation IDs.\n- Surface approval, policy, reconciliation, provenance, and audit states in UI.\n- Add duplicate-event, failed-provider, retry, compensation, and cross-tenant tests.\n- Publish component ownership and dependency catalog.\n\n### P2 — Scale and maintainability\n\n- Consolidate or formally separate overlapping apps/services/packages.\n- Build operator trace explorer and SLO dashboards.\n- Standardize Product Package templates and automated contract scaffolding.\n- Remove legacy backups/reference artifacts from active engineering paths.\n\n## Metrics\n\n- 100% of production routes have an owner, readiness status, data source, and automated test.\n- 100% of material mutations have correlation ID, audit evidence, reconciliation state, and verified readback.\n- 0 exposed placeholder routes or ungated TODO actions in production.\n- 100% of deployable components are covered by monorepo checks and release policy.\n- Golden-path E2E pass rate: at least 99% over the last 50 CI runs before production promotion.\n- Cross-tenant isolation suite: 100% pass, zero tolerated exceptions.\n- False-success rate for governed mutations: 0.\n\n## Governance Cadence\n\n- Daily: P0 blocker review with named owners and evidence links.\n- Twice weekly: golden-path walkthrough in the E2E environment.\n- Weekly: architecture boundary, package dependency, and route-readiness review.\n- Before release: evidence-based go/no-go review; no self-attestation without deployed test and readback evidence.\n"}