{"slug":"business/READINESS","title":"READINESS","section":"business","sectionLabel":"Business","status":"unclassified","type":"document","path":"business/READINESS.mdx","bytes":7637,"description":null,"updated":null,"source":"integratewise/Integratewise-docs-wiki","content":"\n> **Tier C — Historical.** This document is a point-in-time snapshot preserved for reference. For current architecture, see [CANONICAL_PLATFORM_ARCHITECTURE.md](../architecture/CANONICAL_PLATFORM_ARCHITECTURE.md).\n\nStatus: CURRENT\nScope: Evidence-based operational readiness for platform, product, Customer Zero, and documentation readiness\nCanonical Owner: Hermes / Documentation reconciliation\nLast Verified: 2026-07-11\nEvidence Basis: docs/CANON.md, docs/FINAL_E2E_SYSTEM.md, docs/CANONICAL_STATE.md, docs/architecture/l1-reality-check.md, docs/architecture/WORKBENCH_DOCTRINE.md, docs/operations/CF_WIRE_STATUS.md, docs/operations/ENDPOINT_MAP.md, docs/internal/operations/CUSTOMER_ZERO_FLOW_TEST.md, docs/internal/operations/OPERATIONAL_STATE.md, docs/internal/status/TWIN_DEPLOYMENT_STATUS.md, docs/internal/status/TWIN_ORCHESTRATOR_DEPLOYMENT.md, docs/internal/status/TWIN_AGENT_DEPLOYMENT_PLAN.md, docs/archive/DEPLOYMENT_ANALYSIS_FULL.md, docs/archive/DEPLOYMENT_STATUS.md, docs/archive/CUSTOMER_ZERO_LAUNCH.md, docs/archive/IMPLEMENTATION_COMPLETE.md, docs/platform-specs/\\_MASTER_INDEX.md, Option B branch divergence audit, wrangler manifests, README.md\nSupersedes: none\nSuperseded By: none\n\nReadiness documentation and runtime are separate. This document does not claim runtime or product readiness. It classifies documentation readiness only unless explicitly noted.\n\n---\n\n## 1. READINESS STATEMENT BY BOUNDARY\n\n### 1.1 Documentation Readiness\n\nCurrent documentation readiness state:\n\n```text\nPARTIALLY_RECONCILED\n```\n\nReason: canonical docs created for Product, Platform, Architecture, L1 Workbench, SPINE, CONTINUITY, HERMES, GOVERNANCE, CAPABILITY-FABRIC, INTEGRATION-MANAGER, MCP, MIGRATION-STATE, DEPLOYMENT-STATE, RUNTIME-TOPOLOGY, CUSTOMER-ZERO, and docs/README.md; migration and correction work for existing docs is still pending as D6. Contradiction map exists; not all contradictions are replayed yet.\n\nDocumentation readiness is not operational readiness.\n\n### 1.2 Platform Readiness\n\nCurrent platform readiness state:\n\n```text\nDOCUMENTED_WITH_KNOWN_GAPS\n```\n\nEvidence supporting:\n\n- wrangler manifests show extensive deployable service coverage\n- Option B Wave 0 evidence supports plausible deployment pathway\n- Platform specs exist and are strong\n- Tier A canon docs exist\n- Workflows, queues, durable objects, and routes are described/manifested\n\nKnown gaps:\n\n- Supabase removal incomplete\n- One-auth enforcement unverified\n- Package topology not settled\n- Platform runtime topology not fully verified end-to-end\n- Many expected target runtime identifiers such as spine-writer, schema-synthesis, governance are unverified\n- Cloudflare runtime inventory not closed in repo\n- Customer Zero activation not verified end-to-end\n\nDo not classify platform as operational\n\n### 1.3 Product Readiness\n\nCurrent product readiness state:\n\n```text\nUNKNOWN_DOCUMENTED_STATE\n```\n\nKnown evidence:\n\n- L1 Workbench doctrine frozen\n- canonical L1 target is apps/web\n- apps/web may currently be next/vercel entangled\n- apps/workspace may hold corpus evidence\n- department surfaces are documented as Context Lenses\n\nUnknowns:\n\n- production deployment of canonical app surface\n- verified auth route (Gateway JWT vs Supabase vs other)\n- verified L1 Workbench runtime against production spine/runtime\n- L2/L3 product surfaces still observed; they conflict with L1-only product law\n\nProvisional product verdict: documented target is stable, but current product surface cannot be classified CURRENT without app/runtime/readback evidence.\n\n### 1.4 Cloudflare Deployment Readiness\n\nCurrent deployment readiness state:\n\n```text\nDOCUMENTED_WITH_KNOWN_GAPS\n```\n\nEvidence:\n\n- worker manifests for at least 30 service and package workers present\n- documented routes on gateway, pipeline, intelligence, twin, mcp-connector, webhooks\n- documented service bindings on gateway, connector, continuity, webhook-ingress, agent-registry, iw-agent-runtime, loader, tenants, store\n\nGaps:\n\n- runtime traffic not verified\n- queue consumers and producers operational state not verified\n- Durable Object active provenance not verified\n- 98-account worker claim not audited in repo evidence\n- Supabase secret references show continued legacy exposure for several workers\n\n### 1.5 Customer Zero Readiness\n\nCurrent Customer Zero readiness state:\n\n```text\nDOCUMENTED_WITH_KNOWN_GAPS\n```\n\nEvidence:\n\n- onboarding documents and playbooks exist\n- flow test documents exist\n- auth, tenant resolution, and hydration ideal flow are documented\n\nGaps:\n\n- frontend flow type unknown: UI navigation, frontend state, API contract, integration, or true end-to-end\n- canonical writer path not traced\n- continuity state recovery not traced\n- L1 Workbench ready claim evidence absent\n\n---\n\n## 2. FINAL READINESS VERDICT\n\n```text\nDOCUMENTED_WITH_KNOWN_GAPS\n```\n\nThis means:\n\n- high-signal canonical doctrine now exists for platform, product, L1, SPINE, CONTINUITY, HERMES, GOVERNANCE, CAPABILITY-FABRIC, INTEGRATION-MANAGER, MCP, MIGRATION-STATE, RUNTIME-TOPOLOGY, DEPLOYMENT-STATE, and CUSTOMER-ZERO\n- product/runtime evidence gaps remain closed\n- documentation completeness is advancing but not finished\n- operational readiness is not claimed\n\nThis verdict is documentation readiness, not product/runtime readiness.\n\n---\n\n## 3. UPDATES BY EVIDENCE DOMAIN\n\n### 3.1 product\n\n- L1 target doctrine: stable\n- apps/web canonical target: stable\n- apps/workspace evidence: pending verification\n- Dept context lens doctrine: stable\n- L1 twin buttons: stable\n\n### 3.2 platform\n\n- PLATFORM/ARCHITECTURE docs stable\n- Capability Fabric component table left as evidence placeholders pending repo tracing\n- Integration Manager docs stable\n- Governance runtime migration in progress\n- Hermes role stable\n- spawn-writer runtime role: UNKNOWN until verified\n\n### 3.3 runtime\n\n- Manifest-level service discovery complete\n- Deployment classification is conservative and pending runtime review\n- Option B Wave 0 cherry-pick ready per divergence audit\n- Cloudflare runtime inventory not closed\n- App/publish boundary stable at apps/web target\n\n### 3.4 migration\n\n- Supabase removal: MIGRATING\n- One-auth enforcement: MIGRATING\n- Package topology: MIGRATING\n- App boundary: MIGRATING\n- Runtime topology: MIGRATING\n\n### 3.5 Customer Zero\n\n- Landing: DOCUMENTED\n- Tenant on-boarding: DOCUMENTED\n- canonical hydration: UNKNOWN\n- Activation E2E: UNKNOWN\n\n### 3.6 Docs\n\n- Tier A canon docs: created\n- Tier B/Tier C docs: mostly not yet touched\n- Canonical doc index: created\n- Root README merge markers: still present and must be resolved\n\n### 3.7 Future next steps\n\n1. Replay D6 on all existing Tier A/B docs\n2. Replay contradiction checks against Tier A docs and replace stale claims\n3. Verify Cloudflare runtime inventory per docs/operations/ENDPOINT_MAP.md\n4. Verify Customer Zero activation end-to-end\n5. Verify only-AUTH architecture\n6. Verify spine-writer runtime identity and write authority\n7. Verify schema-synthesis runtime state\n8. Verify governance migration state from integratewise-govern worker\n9. Verify L1 app path\n10. Finalize docs/README.md as stable canon index\n\n---\n\n## 4. DOCUMENTS THAT PRECEDE THIS\n\n- docs/CANONICAL_STATE.md\n- docs/CANON.md\n- docs/FINAL_E2E_SYSTEM.md\n- docs/architecture/l1-reality-check.md\n- docs/internal/operations/OPERATIONAL_STATE.md\n- docs/internal/status/TWIN_DEPLOYMENT_STATUS.md\n- docs/internal/status/TWIN_ORCHESTRATOR_DEPLOYMENT.md\n- docs/archive/DEPLOYMENT_STATUS.md\n- docs/archive/DEPLOYMENT_READY.md\n- docs/archive/CUSTOMER_ZERO_LAUNCH.md\n\nWhen conflict arises between this document and those documents, this document is canonical.\n"}